Oryx Blog Ukraine - This list only includes destroyed vehicles and devices for which photo or video evidence is available. Therefore, the amount of property destroyed is more than what is listed here. Small arms, ATGMs, manpads, mortars, military guns, drones used as random bait, civilian vehicles, trailers and lost equipment (including aircraft) are not included in this list. All possible efforts have been made to avoid intrusions and to determine the condition of equipment in those caught or abandoned. Many documents listed as 'abandoned' may eventually be confiscated or destroyed. Similarly, some seized property may be destroyed if it cannot be returned. If a piece of equipment is not identified, it is not included in the list. The Soviet flag is used when the machines in question were manufactured before 1991. This list will be updated regularly as more photos become available.
Special thanks to LotA, Caliber Obscura, Ukraine Weapons, Instant Reporter, ZOKA, Aldin, Mukhtar Magomedov, The Military Watch and Zloneversleep.
Oryx Blog Ukraine
Idlib Turkey Shooting: Destruction and seizure of vehicles and equipment by Turkish and rebel forces (1, damage)
Putin's Worsening Problems
Labels: Bayraktar TB2, DNR, Donbass, Donetsk, Donetsk People's Republic, Eastern Ukraine, property loss, list, Luhansk, Luhansk People's Republic, NATO, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian war, Ukraine, conflict is settling quickly. In one of the most horrific and costly wars of modern times, taking place in Eastern Europe, further evidence of extraordinary losses on both sides is evident. [1] Ukrainian cities are collapsing overnight in brutal bombings due to the intensity and disregard for civilian life, but the loss of property, especially on the Russian side, is staggering. In the midst of this chaos, Ukraine has now received a strong movement of arms, although the decision-making process is lacking, some of its most generous (albeit limited) contributions so far have come from the Russian military. [1]
Although free weapons come from a myriad of sources, the few known shipments that have not yet materialized show the limits of foreign military aid. Perhaps most painfully, the disagreement within NATO over the donation of (Polish) MiG-29 fighter jets to support the Ukrainian Air Force was a public fiasco. Doubt is understandable, as countries weigh their level of political resolve and what reality can bring before the most important question of all: What weapons does Ukraine need?
While the idea of military support, especially against a major enemy like Russia, often conjures up images of lines of main battle tanks, advanced air defenses and fighter jets roaring into space, most aid has taken an infantry-heavy approach. Weapons. and tools. Another practical reason is that the recipients often work ex-Soviet equipment and therefore do not know what many of Ukraine's supporters can offer. The advantage of infantry weapons, and especially those types that are widely deployed, is that they require some training to know them and be able to use them properly. This requirement only includes military assistance for equipment that is easy to use or that Ukrainian users already have experience working with.
The reason we never see lines of armored vehicles changing hands on the Ukrainian border is because many politicians abroad believe that such shipments risk escalating the conflict and eventually leading to open war between NATO and Russia. . Such thinking fails to take into account the fact that the current narrative in the Russian media is that the Russian military is waging a proxy war in Ukraine against its enemies, and that the current military situation does not allow Vladimir Putin to endanger them. Deployment of conventional weapons. However, even if "low-profile" is taken as one form of arms supply to Ukraine, there are many other types, the (ongoing) introduction of which could be considered a game changer.
Tank Losses In Ukraine Raise Strategic Questions For Russia
If the recent controversy has shown anything, it is that they have already introduced round-guided munitions (PGMs), which are very effective in terms of their ability to affect the munitions sector and force a quick exit. On the battlefield. A limiting factor is often the prohibitive cost of such devices, and their high-end nature sometimes prevents widespread adoption. This explains Russia's poor performance so far: the quantity and quality of PGMs they deploy seem to be low, long-range missile strikes are often off-mark and bombers are forced to fly low to deliver them. Unguided rockets and steel bombs. On the Ukrainian side, although all existing and newly released guided weapons have proven to be very effective, the cost of degradation must be very high and most of the weapons in question will only be effective for a short period of time. In addition to such weapons, the Ukrainians need long-range anti-aircraft missiles and targeted ground attacks.
Turkey, the other source that comes with such a weapon, has a lot of other things that are very useful. Along with UCAVs like the Bayraktar TB2, which has already taken up the last task so far, it also sends weapon systems like the TRLG-230, the Multiple Rocket Launcher (MRL), which is more lethal due to its precision-guided munitions. . [2] In joint operations with the TB2, it can hit up to four targets but addresses more due to its endurance, the 230mm TRLG-230 bireactor TB2s can quickly destroy selected weapons from UCAVs with maximum speed. 70 kilometers. . [3] This capability can not only destroy Russian ground forces, but also disrupt naval landings and other operations given its range and excellent accuracy.
Indeed, more could be done to get the most out of Ukraine's already lethal UCAV equipment. Although surprisingly maneuverable given the environment in which its drones are placed, their success in some previous conflicts has been enhanced by the use of electric power (counter) warfare techniques, which reduce the threat from enemy air defenses and thus increase opportunity. Complete control of the battlefield. Such systems could be very low-profile but high-impact additions to Ukraine's arsenal.
Unfortunately, to keep Ukraine's assets on the ground and ensure that Russia does not gain air superiority, it needs air defense forces. Although MANPADS (both imported from Ukraine) have performed poorly in the conflict, the longer systems give defenders more freedom in friendly environments, enabling better protection and countermeasures. Currently, the only equipment known to public Ukraine obtained in the region remains from Russia, whose forces have so far left 20 air defense systems behind in various battles and retreats. [1] The problem with the expansion of foreign air defenses is that Ukrainian workers have to train for a long time before they acquire the skills to operate, but the equipment is needed now. While some have encouraged Turkey to introduce its S-400 SAM system, this one issue also begs the question of why they are considered the only ones responsible for introducing sophisticated SAMs. [4] In practice, Ukraine would probably benefit more from mobile-to-long-range air defenses such as the 9K33 Osa, Finland, Tor, and the Buk-M1, which could be supplied by Bulgaria, Greece, or Poland. -M1 from Greece and S-300PMU(-1 ) from Bulgaria, Slovakia and Greece. This is very useful in denying Russia full control of Ukraine's airspace, which puts sending countries at a political and economic disadvantage.
Observing The Battlefields Of The World With \
Finland's Buk-M1s (ITO 96s) have been retired from operational service but are kept in operational condition for wartime use.
In the area of infantry weapons, apart from widely publicized anti-tank weapons, manpads and small arms (not to mention night vision devices, which allowed Ukraine to prevail in night fighting), roving troops and other non-line . Sight gun gives him an edge over his enemy. Although the US recently promised a batch of 300 of the deadly Switchblade, many weapons of this class are needed to repel the Russian army, which normally lacks such weapons. [5] Unfortunately, Israel, one of the major producers and users of such equipment, is currently unwilling to join its allies in providing any military support to Ukraine. Some major arms manufacturers like Turkey (STM Kargu), Poland (WB Electronics Warmate) or the US have to take this important requirement.
Since the weapon's effectiveness is largely limited by your ability to spot enemy targets, one area where it excels in both impact and delivery capabilities is reconnaissance drones. Especially those types that babies can easily carry, launch and use
Sig p365 tulster holster, sig p365 iwb holster, sig holsters p365, sig p365 sas holster, sig p365 xl holster, sig p365 hybrid holster, appendix holster sig p365, safariland holster sig p365, sig p365 belt holster, sig p365 holster, sig p365 purse holster, sig sauer p365 holster
0 Comments